The entire purpose of human evaluation is to provide genuine human judgment. Using AI tools to do the evaluation for you defeats the purpose and produces training data that actively degrades model quality. Our policy on AI/LLM usage is strict and non-negotiable.
What is allowed
- Spelling correction: You may use the spell-checker built into your browser or the platform. Cloud writing assistants (Grammarly, browser AI extensions and similar) send your text to a third party, so they are not allowed on project work.
- Dictionaries and thesauruses: You may look up word definitions and synonyms in a dictionary or thesaurus.
What is strictly prohibited
- Using AI to evaluate or assess response quality. You may not ask ChatGPT, Claude, Gemini, or any other AI system to tell you which response is better.
- Using AI to generate justifications or explanations. Your rationale for why one response is better must come from your own reasoning.
- Using AI to predict code behaviour or runtime results. If a task involves evaluating code, you must assess it yourself.
- Having AI compose or rewrite your submissions. AI may not write or rewrite your responses, even partially. Your browser's spell-checker is the only exception.
Enforcement
Submissions are monitored for signals of AI-generated content. If your work is flagged as AI-assisted beyond the allowed scope:
- Your submission will be rejected.
- You will receive a warning or, in serious cases, immediate contract termination.
- Repeated violations result in a permanent ban from the platform.
The rule of thumb: every word, judgment and line of reasoning you submit must be yours. Your browser's spell-checker may fix typos, and nothing else may touch your text.